 |
| Hypocrisy rules |
We all have argued and debated in our lives especially with
people online. Now when you argue or debate you expect people to be genuine and
natural, at least when it happens amongst people we know. Trolls are trolls,
but here a recent incident of my argument on FB with a friend I worked with for
almost a year makes me differ.
It all started with a post made in humour about the recent
beef ban or rather a complete ban on cow slaughter in my home state
Maharashtra. I have abbreviated the names to maintain privacy of individuals
concerned.
Me - Good for all
(while the post is all about
LOLs and humour, I took an exception to it and posted a simple yet serious
response.)
RL - Good!! Where??
(This is the starting point of
the conversation that moves from humour post to a serious conversation)
Me - Good for animals and man too RL
(I explain myself to be more
clear on what I meant)
RL - Ya ya..... Good for the Cow
(The attitude is still
irreverant)
Me - Food for thought check out >
http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/ethical_living/some-of-the-most-common-arguments-given-by-meat-eaters/
(I try to reason with an article post I read
that contains several rational, logical and statistical points)
RL - just because you are brought up in a Hindu Brahmin
family you are talking about this..... what if you were brought up in a
Christian or a Muslim family or any other family who eats meat?
(when reason fails, the
victimization approach shows up, as if giving up beef or cruelty towards
animals was an exclusive prerogative of the Hindus and requires a tough call of
Ghar wapsi for his ilk. If at all it does, I think it makes sense for his
entire cult to do that asap)
Me - If I see things correctly the Almighty created us all
as equals with virtues of love, compassion for all creation of God including
animals, its just a matter of thought, conscience. And besides that the numbers
in the article are not ones to be ignored.
(I try to reason on his point;
mind you it is here where his response has taken a communal turn to this conversation,
though I still focus on reasoning and rationality)
RL - If you think that god created all humans and animals as
equals.... Then why are we living in flats and animals are on roads starving.
Also I don't know how authentic is that article you posted......
every human thinks they are right in their own way. Some talk about it and some
create articles like these.
So the article means to say the no vegetarian have died of
cancer, cholesterol and heart attacks??? Will saving animals solve the deforestation
crisis?? Why only ban beef? ban killing of all animals..... Will the country or
the world Will be able to sustain that?
Trust me I am not interested what people do with their lives
being a vegetarian or not. But you cannot just enforce thing just because some
people though so??
(More dogmatic logic that is
driven by sub conscious dogma for the cult because it cant stand human logic
and reasoning. Simple comprehension with reference to context would be enough
to understand my reference that I explain in my comment below.)
Me – RL you got me wrong, I never said man and animals to be
equal, I was referring to your comment abt me being Hindu Brahmin, animals
arent equal as man in intelligence but they do sense pain like us. Hence we
live in flats and you dont realise enough cause someone else kills them for
youi. Not sure if you read the article it counters all arguments of
deforestation too. References have been quoted within. Finally I'd say our love
for the cow can be seen in the light of Christians' and Muslims' love for their
Prophets. Its believed he sacrificed his life 2000 years back for love. I get
my love everyday #milk and I'm grateful for that, hence the joy on #beefban
(I still make a futile attempt
to drive the conversation to rational thinking and logical thought that forms
the basis of his dogma. Still make an attempt to drive him to key stats and
reasoning within the article)
RL - Trust me AS(that’s me), we can go on and on in this.
Also I don't see any connection between my question and your response.... I
wish and pray you continue living the way of life you have been living...... I
shall not question you, shove article's in front of you stating how eating non
veg will save this planet or even think of serving non veg when we meet.
But trust me I still love a beef burger, beef kheema and
beef steak........#beefban
(Now the accusation of
irrelevance when he realises he is the one who has been irrelevant so far,
stresses his beliefs, adding animal misogynism to fuel his self belief)
RF – RL I haven't seen any tiger die of a heart
disease...the moment anyone touched my food plate they made it personal.
Regrettably, this is the real " Sabka saath Sabka
vikas"...majoritarianism at its worst...Man was born wild...just like the
tiger...Later laziness creeped in and he resorted to farming..all lousy hunters
switched to farming...unsurprisingly some lousy hunters stills under the cover of
night gorge on hunters spoils...more self proclaimed veggies line up to buy
beef at beef stalls...coz not only its poor man's meat...its a dish of the
world...by that measure the world who eats beef are monsters...are they !
Phew...wait till more such unilateral majoritarian leanings are thrusted on the
meeker citizens...
(Support from the ilk and the
cult now… claims of right to food and idiotic analogies to tigers. Moves on to
accuse the democratic process and the government. See the highlighted part to
rate his sub zero IQ level into negative integers. )
AS - We can speak when we meet bro... anyways I'm happy that
the law is on my side for now
(I try to end it to avoid any
further with a positive proclamation on the law of the land )
RM - When there was a Ban on Pork in Kashmir then y there
was no Hue and CRY
(Some support from an unknown
friend who shares same belief as me and rationale too which is evident from his
question)
RL – RM what was the % of pork eaters in Kashmir????
(Talking numbers when it suits
convenience, rationalistic hypocrisy at its best, wasn’t ready to even consider
the numbers quoted in the article)
RM - So can you let us know what is the % of Cow meat eaters
in Maharashtra
(But then problem with hypocrisy
is that it fails the test of rationalism, counter question stumps RL)
RM - Majoritarians in Kashmir doesn't want Pork same as in
Maharshtra
(More rationalism, more logic)
RM - Beef is not ban in Goa because Majoritarians doesn't
want ban on that
(Hypocrites in silent mode now)
RF - Kashmir vs maharashtra. Don't think vr comparing apples
to apples ! Many things / laws don't apply to Kashmir versus rest of India. The
question is can majority decide the food plate of the minority. FOOD PLATE !!!
Isn't this talibanisation ?
(More hypocrisy, now looking for
cover in geo-politics since argument cant be answered either ways)
RM - And for your information in GOA there is a BJP govt
(Cultists are losers at politics
too)
RF - Goa cannot ban beef Bcoz Goa is a tourism state. Ban
beef and the state will be in doldrums. It's pure economics. Atithi Devo bhava
(Idiot arguing to aid drift from
the real arguments, trying to shift the beef guilt blame onto tourists)
RM - ohhhh Every thing will be compare, U also can have a
Statewise comparison where Cow meat is banned
(Rationalism at its best, throws
a geo-infographic oblivious of the fact that the idiot’s husk filled brain cant
comprehend anything intellectual)
RF - India is turning into another Taliban. Frisson state of
the country. I understand someone doesn't want to eat and I respect that but I
don't give someone the unequivocal right to decide what I can eat or should eat
and expect that to be respected in equal measure. Rest my case
(More victimization at play,
parasite abusing the very same country it thrives on comparing it to failed
states, trying to sneak out of the argument seeing little room for legitimacy
of his stance)
RM - Aahh that's the typical answer of the looser. Go the
Muslim Majority & write against them u will come 2 know about Taliban
(Rationalism trying to highlight facts of differences that
hypocrisy is trying to equate. And ironically the volume of humans killed in
other countries is more than that of animals killed in India)
Me - Right to
migration
(After a long break, I try to end it with a quip)
RM - Ohh If Someone demands that they want to Eat a Human
Flesh so according to you govt should allow them. Because it's there right to
decide what they want to eat
(Rationalism giving an alternate simulation to stupid
hypocrisy to analyse)
RF - I pardon your ignorance since you are blinded by the
majoritarian ego...For your kind information and at your leisure please read
the Indian constitution. When I last read it it was still secular ! You are
entitled to your radical view...and I am entitled to mine view...this is
India...Welcome to India bro...the real India doesn't think radically like you
do..all live in right to equal acceptance..brotherhood and tolerance...atleast
that's what we do on our planet not sure what they do on where you come
from...rest my case
(Now for the sake of lame
defence, hypocrisy takes a turn towards quoting civics and constitution, albeit
at its convenience and in parts)
RM - Ahhhh typical
Sickular logic
(Rationalism finally realizes
hypocrisy at work)
RM - 24 out of 29 states in India currently have various
regulations prohibiting either the slaughter or sale of cows
(More numbers)
Me - Russell if majoritarian ego prevents murder of innocent
animals so be it, RIP secularism
(Humanity anyone ??)
RM - Are u talking about the secular constitution go &
read the Article 38A in Constitution which allows the state govt have a right
to ban the Slaughter of Cow
(The gets lessons in civics)
RF - RM n AS..I respect ur sentiments and it's very easy to
get carried away...FYI the beef served in hotels n shops is not beef
anyway..Cow slaughter was banned way back in 1976...the new ban is extending it
to calves, Bulls and bullocks....the new law doesn't ban slaughter of Buffaloes
which is what is carabeef...the regular carabeef will continue to be on the
plates !!! So your angst is needless and misguided...as far as murder of
innocent animals is concerned...strictly speaking even the extreme veggies will
agree that all feast on death ( aint counting the billion innocent microbes and
bacteria that we so deliciously ruminate on)....anyone and everyone feasts on
death of something innocent..so let's not be hypocritical...the trend of "
I am right and you are wrong " and " I am majority so I will decide
and you can squirm"...is setting a disturbing trend in a nation which
simply can't afford it...peace be with you both...enjoy ur weekend while I
feast on what's on my plate mainly beef !
(Trying to be politically
correct and peddling another silly argument of bacteria and plants which is
already debunked by science)
RL - Sorry for not responding...... my net was not working
(Tech glitches or time out)
RM - How foolish ur logic is . The pic is show above is of
COW not a Buffalo. So who is hypocrites every1 knows
(RM exposing hypocrites on a
roll)
RL – RM answering your question..... 0% of people eat cow
meat as it was stopped year's ago. Even import of cow meat... I have no idea if
cow's were slaughtered illegally. I suggest you answer my question now..
(Again trying to appropriate the
argument to pose diversionary questions)
RM - Now it is made a criminal offence & for your answer
in Kashmir 99% population is of Muslims so they are following there Sharia law
(Straight answer)
RL - Thanks RM for answering your question......
(Rare courtesy)
RM - Most Welcome RL
(Reciprocated)
RF - Gais...each of you are entitled to your own view
point...this is India..let's Moooooooo on...
(Trying to escape with a face to
save, using puns to mock the other side)
RM - Thanks for letting us know & if Cow slaughter was
ban already then How Come Cow has a Ache Din
(Plain rationalism)
Me - Russell you need to study pre school science to
understand if we are really killing bacteria, they are still alive in curd even
after consumption... the article link above will help you understand the
difference between plants and animals
(Trying to debunk the myths
about bacteria. Bacteria consumed by us aren’t killed. They are consumed as
good bacteria that aid our physiological well being and survive within our
bodies. Quoting the article to educate the idiot)
RF - Amit...what's the use of learning anything in
pre-school when people grow up and become intolerant...be that as it may...with
due respect to you biology mastery...a simple Google search will help you
appreciate the view point little better ( btw last time when I found out plants
were "living" things and there is more "living" microbes in
ones food than in the faeces)...unless you don't want to understand. In such
case, even Aristotle can't help...Let's moooo on to each its own..without
drooling over each other's plate..
(Cheap philosophical preaching
of tolerance. Reasoning for tolerance when himself arguing for killing innocent
animals as food.)
MF - For people saying that cows give them milk....so does
the goat y not ban them. Hens lay eggs which we consume ban that as well. And
to top it off trees n plants are responsible for producing the oxygen we
consume.....stop eating that as well. Its jus a very once sided logic which ppl
choose to use as per their convinience.
(Second accomplice of the cult,
giving illogical analogies of hens and eggs. Idiot chooses to ignore that
oxygen emanating plants are grown again for the next crop.)
RM - Is Hens, Goat are holy 2 any1. If yes banned it.
(RM counters and asks for a
total ban on killing for food.)
MF - You did not answer bout the plants....... I assume u
are Vegetarian. As I said, right above me is the perfect display to "Logic
as per convinience"
(Plant question remains)
Me - More scientific ignorance...
(facepalm)
MF - Please do you care to explain the science behind my
argument...... or do you wanna jus throw words like science, bramins, hindus
and prove your self superiority
(Racism part 2. Accusing with
claims nobody ever made during this entire argument)
Me - Its getting racist now ... Mervyn you were one of us 2k
years back#retrospect & respect
(Racism answered with historical
facts)
MF - There it is another random
word......"racist"...... Place note that me and you are of the same
race.....Indians/Asians.
(Cant take the sting from the
response, trying to drive the conversation elsewhere)
MF - I have the same respect for you dude but try not
enforcing your way of life on others
(Trying to be politically
correct)
Me - I aint doing it ... a lawfully elected govt is doing
it... and you still have the freedom to eat without killing if your conscience
allows you to. And appreciating the mutual respect we all have for each others'
religions giving up beef wouldnt need law enforcement
(Simple answer, a democratically
elected government imposes a ban on beef )
MF - Yea I kno the govt is doing this but don't we live in a
secular country!!! I don't have the right to eat now because it's banned
alrite!!! So I hope u understand wat I'm saying. So now the govt will decide
wat I can and cannot eat. I can respect u and ur religious without affecting my
food habits. That's all I'm saying
(The argument of secularism, the
nut feels secularism supercedes democracy)
Me - Mervyn the food habit argument aint rational...
tomorrow cannibals may claim special rights to slaughter humans under
"sickularism"
(Again cannibals can also claim
to be minority someday and demand human meat for food, will secularism comply?
)
MF - See there you go.....you have youself claimed that you
do not want Secularism by calling it " sickularism " and have
compared other religons to cannibalism. And you say you respect
me........Please avoid the hypocrisy buddy.
(Cry victimization part 2, so
with no reference to religion, conclusively decides for me what I intended to
say and also that it was hypocrisy…long live hypocrisy.)
MF - Now you see what kind of Govt we have......One that
divides us on issues like these. Hoping there is a re election soon. N jus like
in delhi BJP will no longer be voted again. Ashamed for voting such a govt.
(Abusing politics part 2)
Me - I think Hinduism is secular enough for everyone around
it, hence no need for fake mask of secularism. I did not liken anything to
cannibalism, if you see similarities its your problem... anyways I feel our
discussion is spoiling RL’s social profile
(my 3rd attempt to make my stand
clear and avoid any further argument)
MF - So you see your argument clearly states my previous
fact that things are used as per one's convenience. Jus a lil earlier you where
the one calling it " sickularism " n now u say Hinduism is secular
enough. Also, since so long you having been using Science as an
argument.......So now I say science does not believe in God but m sure you will
dis the same science whose support u were using ealier. N m sure RL's social
profile is fine. Its just the truth that hurts a few.
(Now the nut in his narcissistic
sense of ownership of science as a thought system proclaims his belief to be
the global belief of the line of human thought that is actually an abstract
notion)
Me - You are new to online terminologies it seems.
Sickularism reffers to the fake secularism. Your narcicissm crosses human
limits when you claim on behalf of science doesnt believe in God. Hinduism
predates everything and Hinduism is scientific enough to find a place globally.
Truth hurts and it did hurt Mother Teresa too recently.
(Some things explained)
MF - 1) Oh realy thn pls enlighten me ....... Wat is Fake
Secularism? Wat did I say reflected Fake Secularism. I respect hindus but I
dont want to be one. Its not the way of life I choose. So is that a crime???
2) And wats with narcicissm???? Look up the definition n you
shall see thats exaclty wat u are since you think so higly of your beliefs that
others should also follow. I never enforced anything or any of my beliefs to
others. I just wanna have beef and that right has been taken from me. And
that's all im pissed about.
(More crap trying to justify his
holy self and debating on irrelevant parts of the conversation)
Me - You are narcissist when you claim to speak on behalf of
science an abstract description of line of study. Hinduism has never done to
its people anything to what what invaders have.
(Dictionary explanation given
with example)
MF - You haven't replied to my first point. You seem to be
answering arguments as per ur convince I see. Anyways bottom line is I'm not
happy with the government banning beef and will continue to to hope the next
government lifts this stupid ban.
(Accusation trying to counter
facts)
Me - Lolllzzzz I can see the kejriwal in u who asks
questions to everyone but doesn't want to answer...read the entire discussion
to discover....hahaha
(Me trying to pull off a
political joke on Arvind Kejriwal…anyways this guys name rhymed with Arvind
Kejriwal)
MF - Wats wrong with u man!!! With me wanting to eat beef
I've now become Kejriwal!!!! Stop making a fool of yourself man.....
(Irritation)
Me - Its OK mervyn anyways ive realised I've been doing this
as futile as blowing trumpet to buffaloes
(Finally I realize my mistake in
preaching Persian to Chinese)
MF - Thnk God atleast now you realise how we feel this
everyday wen we come across such arguments with religious blinded folks!!!
Peace out!!!!
(Thankful this seems to be
coming to an end, tries to end it with a blame on me)
Me - And you still don't realize how we feel when we quietly
tolerate this secular hypocrisy that stands no moral, ethical, rational,
economical standards of humans...thx for sharing your values...will add to my
do not list
(I give it back as good as it
gets)
RL – AS seriously man what's up with you? Lost your mind or
something? I saw your wall and noticed nobody cares a shit what you post....
and here you come insulting my friend's...... If you have a problem with my
posts or my friends comments block me and sod off!!!!
(RL is back with vengeance and
with big lies claiming my insulting behavior towards his friends. Left with no
valid arguments or a decent exit from the current situation he tries to play up
the lack of social action on my timeline as a legitimate justification for his
cruel craving for beef. Tries to shoo me off to avoid further obvious
embarrassment on his timeline)
AAC - Wow ! So much over a piece of beef.. Now I truly finds
its worth..
(A dickhead trying to score some
social brownie points)
RL - Seriously man!!!
(Reassuring himself of
righteousness)
Me – RL Im perfectly fine, mind body and soul...doesn't matter
if my wall doesn't seem fine to you...my opinions stand by moral ethics which
is enough for my conscience, I didn't insult any one anywhere though I pointed
out it wouldn't be appropriate to further it, one of them went on....I have no
problem with what you post Roncy ....seems a few have problem with someone
calling spade a spade and the law too ...u won't find any other comments from
me ever... though I'd always be a friend and as open as I am
(My final slap to RL where I
comprehensively present my claim to sensibility and the blatant hypocrisy of
his petty club on all counts during the course of this conversation)
MF - Oh you poor soul!!! Feel sry for what politics and
religion had done to you. Hope you get well soon buddy.
(The nut trying to score some
brownie points knowing that I wont be posting any more)
RM - ohhhh what a Sacred Soul not indulge in Politics &
religion. Go & See all the comments u will come 2 know who is indulge in
region & politics
(But wait RM isn’t done yet,
comes back to rap the nut)
MF - Go and see his wall n you'll understand what m talking
about
(So finally the focus of the
argument for the morons has shifted from rational human thinking on beef ban to
my profile)
RM - Why are u upset by seeing his wall. So to impress u he
should post what u guys will like.
(Despising people basis of their
opinions and beliefs is tool of morons who want to manipulate people to suit
their interests)
RM - Ohhhh he is a BJP supporter & ur against BJP &
Modi.So you can cry as much you want
(More for the nut)
MF - Lol look dude I'll leave it up to the ppl reading wat
they think bout the comments. Let's just stop this here, we all have better
things in life to do. It's Saturday out n enjoy
(Still looking for excuses to
seek a reputable exit from the muck throwing they indulged in)
RM - Who has Started Majoritrians , Minoritrains, About BJP
govt, People will come 2 know by reading the comments & yes have a Great
Weekend
(The internet never forgets,
though I have my doubts due to lack of trust on the moron club, I decided to
write this blog and I also possess the
screenshots of the conversation that I’d post as a proof of authenticity)
RL – RM, yes I post stuff on my wall which people like.
Instead of posting things which create unwanted hatred and divide.
Just because I don't post religion, bjp posts, congress
posts etc that doesn't mean I hate my country and people around me.
The post I added was for fun. that's why the "lol"
comment with an intention that my friends will have a laugh over it. Those
friends who liked my posts are non vegetarian and pure vegetarians. They saw my
post laughed over it and moved on. Rest of my friend's who are from different
castes and creed choose to ignore it. I don't have any problems with them. We
all chose to move on.
But you guy's have created such a controversy over it and
look at the result it created hatred and divide among us. I ended up being rude
to a person who I shared such a great rapport when we worked together.
Anyways we all had a 2 days long debate over my post. Which
I seriously didn't expect it to happen.
Let's stop this now.
Wishing you guys have a wonderful weekend
(RL trying to claim how the fault entirely lies
on me for snowballing this conversation into a controversy and how the silence
of others is a (presumed) default validation of his point of view and not a
vindication of my point of view. Trying to play the grand tune of secularism.)
